Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: 2200 IP5 Grayscale

2003-01-18 by jim hayes <jimhayes@frii.com>

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Andrew Rodney 
<andrew@d...> wrote:
> on 1/17/03 8:58 PM, jim hayes:
> > 
> > Yes Andrew I had heard on this list, I believe from you about the 
2880
> > vs 1440 variable dot thing, and I assumed it certainly applied to 
the
> > 1280 and 1160 printers.
> > 
> > But I wasn't sure of the 2200 on IP5 RIP.
> 
> John at ColorByte told me that this is the case with IP and they 
don't
> recommend 2880 settings (despite putting it there so users don't 
bitch and
> producing profiles as well). As to the 1440 setting, I'm not sure if 
it is
> 1400x1400 or 1440x720 but I think the latter. I'll have to ask John 
about
> that one. 
> 
> Andrew Rodney

Well, okay. On the two prints I did where the 2880 dpi looked  
"marginally better" I used an older 1440 print using an older version 
of the driver to compare it to. This, or the fact that each image was 
only around 4 x 5 inch may be fooling me. In a way it is some relief, 
as print time more than doubles.

On the 1440 x 1440 or 1440x 720 question (and 2880 etc), they reason I 
ask is partly curioisty, and partly to know what settings to dial into 
Nik Sharpener.
Jim H.

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.