Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Why Coating was Re: [Digital BW] Re: Printing High-load black pigments

2003-01-26 by Robert Morrison

On 1/25/03 4:20 PM, "Ken Carney" <kcarney1@...> wrote:

>> Speaking of dmax, has anyone else gotten the impression that once
>> you get a coated print and an uncoated print (of the same image)
>> framed under glass or plexy, the APPARENT difference in dmax drops
>> noticeably? This is one of the reasons I abandoned coating....
>> BJ
>> http://www.mcwayne.com

Speaking as an avid coater, my intent was never to glaze coated prints.  I
hate glass/plexiglass you name it.  What coating does is free you from
glazing.  The print is luminous and rich without the glazing...and what's
better is when someone sneezes on it...you wipe it off...when the gallery
owner eats subway that day and then picks up your portfolio...wipe it off.
Personally I just love handling print.  I want them in my hand...not just on
the wall.  That's why you coat.

Robert

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.