> > I am a little confused about metameriam. Is that > > the effect one gets when viewing a print from a > > variety of perspectives where it appears that the tone > > of the inks seem to change? What you are describing is a sort of irredescense, related to, but not true metamerism. The luster papers, when viewed head on take on a particular look. When you change your viewing postion, or the position of the print, it may reflect light other than your main viewing light. Say you are looking at the print under a track light in a Gallery. ( Lets also say there is a large white ceiling in the room, way above, lit by another type of light). You stand there looking at the print as it is lit by the track light and your eyes adjust to it and it looks pleasing. You now either tilt the print or move yourself so the print reflects part of that broadly lit ceiling. The print may take on a sheen or irredescence of a different color. I've read some posts that indicate that some inks, such as Lysons newer archival dye ink, produces a golden metallic looking sheen in the shadow areas (shadow areas being the most heavily inked areas on the print) . Metamerism is more of an overall change of the look in the print under different viewing conditions due to the irregular surface of pigment particles. The print may look perfectly neutral under a 5K hood in your printmaking studio, but in a gallery with tungsten halogens, (aside from the warmer "feel" of tungsten lighting) there may be a magenta/green crossover from shadows to highlights, without having to adjust yourself or the print to reflect other light sources.
Message
Re: metamerism
2003-01-30 by John Luke <jjlphoto@yahoo.com>
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.