> Steve wrote: > > >... over here the Ilford smooth is extremely cheap and > >although coating and peel off have been royal pains, > >I do love the look. > > What do you mean "coating and peel off?" Are you coating the prints after > printing to protect them? Have you found coatings that work well -- or not? > > I heard someone once comment that a matte spray on RC paper gives a more > matte look without loosing much of the dmax, but I have not yet tried that. > Hi Paul, Yep, that was me. I have basically be creating a portfolio of my best B&W work and have 130 odd prints at 11x14 on 13x19 paper in a leather fine art album. Whilst I do like the EAM it is just too delicate a surface for the frequent thumbing it will get - super behind glass though. You can coat it but it drinks so much of the spray that the costs become daft. The Ilford Smooth Pearl is dirt cheap here (UK), I pay £17.99 for 25 A3+ sheets. I coat it now with a semi-matt spray, two coats in short succession, first heavy, second light. Without coating the bronzing is bad and the ink can literally be wiped off the surface - I think the the generations black I am using is absorbed better, you can see the effect under the right light pre- coated and the rub off on pure black is much less. The 'peel off' I referred to is not so common but was an issue where because the ink is not absorbed, if the coating comes away it takes the ink with it. If you let the coating dry FULLY this is not an issue and the surface is very tough, stack them after 20 minutes like I did and youve got a big mosaic..... The cost of the spray is a signicifcant element and I am looking forward to doing away with this when the new VM 'RC' comes out. Also very interested in those UC clones for my colour work..... kind regards Steve
Message
Re: Ilford Smooth (was Paul: Black ink Question)
2003-02-05 by scrber <stephen.bate@mubea.com>
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.