In a message dated 2/10/2003 5:48:01 PM Pacific Standard Time, peter@... writes: > At 12:28 AM 2/10/2003 +0000, DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > wrote: > >There have been several reports that the IP5 rip does not use Yellow ink > >when Printing greyscale images! > > > Cyan+magenta = blue so just subtracting the yellow > doesn't give you a neutral print.Snip So that would mean removing any color from the equation would not neutralize the print tone? Rememebr the second black ink is really Brown! Great profiles will get you neutral, but that doesn't help you if you have metamerism!! Ok maybe I was mistaken! Perhaps it was magenta? With two black tones added to the mix, God knows how many combinations for neutral there might be. Any rate, the reports do shown IP 5 prints seem more neutral and exhibit much less tone shifting in various lighting conditions. I even read someone claim it was only using 3 inks! Eliminating metamerism, by pulling back the offending tints(perhaps yellow?) Is a big step toward neutral as an added bonus. Its pretty well known only 3 inks are needed for continuos tone black and white ink prints. Awhile back when Whilhelm posted his Ultrachrome Longevity ratings, there was some discussion about how the Black and White prints got a 100 year rating when the color prints only got 80years from the same inkset? It was speculated that The Gray balancer or IP prints had one of the weaker inks pulled back quite abit, or that something was different in the make up of the black and white prints. Who knows who or how the Whilhelm prints where made, we only know the black and white prints tested better and there must be a reason for it. I don't use IP 5 or ultrachrome inks, I just repeat what I think I've read, And I do believe IP5 is doing something other than a great profile! Its controlling the individual inks and there mix points! Steve M. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: WHEN will we get simple, reliable BW printing??
2003-02-11 by sdmey4@aol.com
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.