Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: WHEN will we get simple, reliable BW printing??

2003-02-11 by Bob_Michaels <Bob@BobMichaels.org>

Peter: Could be my eyes are bad. I know I'm not a "print worshiper" as
Duane Michels referred to some photo collectors. But looking at my
1280 prints using BO compared to Woolf workflow or Roark workflow, the
dots seem the same both to the naked eye and with a loupe. That's my
prints and others.

Your view certainly is the majority one. I just can't see it myself.
Nor can a few others. Your "degraded eyesight" theory is about the
most plausible one I've heard. 

Bob Michaels

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, peter nelson
<peter@s...> wrote:
> At 12:28 AM 2/10/2003 +0000,
DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com 
> wrote:
> >my 1280 has BO dots that cannot be seen with the naked eye using
> >the Epson driver.
> 
> 
> Maybe not YOUR naked eye, but I can see the 1280's dots
> just fine!
> 
> I've long suspected that the people who like black-only printing
> simply don't have good close visual acuity.  A lot of people as
> they get older and suffer from presbyopia find that they just
> can't focus closely - black-only printing is ideal for them.

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.