I think the only answer to all this is go to a lab who does all the various kind sof printing and pay for some samples. You'll get the best output from each source and you can work from there. Julian ----- Original Message ----- From: <Bob@...> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 4:18 PM Subject: [Digital BW] Re: WHEN will we get simple, reliable BW printing?? > Peter: FWIW, my expereince was that you can load MIS VM ink carts in a > 1280, use the Roark workflow and get same quality prints in the amount > of time necessary to learn how to do the same in a wet darkroom. > Ditto, the MIS FSN inks with Woolf workflow. Ditto, Black Only using > Clayton Jones workflow. None will be great but at least the quality as > a beginning wet darkroom worker having spent the same time. > > BTW, Epson replaced my 1280 under warranty even after I told them it > was ruined by a 3rd party flush cart. > > Bob Michaels > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, peter nelson > <peter@s...> wrote: > > At 09:27 AM 2/12/2003 +0000, > DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > > wrote: > > >Are you asking when simple reliable BW printing will be available or > > >when it will be available using color inks on the 2200? > > > > > >If you insist on using the the 2200 and color inks you will, it seems, > > >not be happy with the results. If you use quadtone inks ( I only have > > >experience with MIS or Piezotones) you will get the quality you are > > >looking for. > > > > > > I don't care if I use the 2200. I'm happy to use any wide format > > (13"x19" or bigger) printer. The requirement is that the process > > does not void the printer's warranty and that I have some reason > > to be confident that *I* can get good results. > > > > As I said in my original post, I have no doubt that SOME people > > can get quads to work well. But the impression I get from > > reading this forum and others is that it's hit and miss, and that > > it depends on your tolerance for tweaking and playing under > > the hood. I've read tons of posts from people who tried it > > really hard and never got good results. I quoted one poster > > who said he tried quads for a YEAR and didn't get as good a > > result as his first print out of the box with his 2200. > > > > I can teach anyone to make decent black and white prints > > in the darkroom in a day. Not necessarily Ansel Adams, > > but black blacks, white whites, continuous tones (assuming > > they exist in the negative, properly developed, fixed, etc. > > It's a simple, predictable, straightforward process. If you > > can follow simple directions it's easy. I'm looking for a > > digital printing process that's similarly straightforward and > > reliable. > > > > Some people here tell me we already have it; others say it will > > never exist, so there seems to be some divergence on that > > point! > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page. > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > - Include your full name with your message. > - Include the address of your website, if you have one. > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short. > - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header. > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or &amp;quot;flames.&amp;quot; > - Complete your Yahoo profile. > - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage. > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: WHEN will we get simple, reliable BW printing??
2003-02-12 by Julian Thomas
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.