Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] Re: WHEN will we get simple, reliable BW printing??

2003-02-12 by Julian Thomas

I think the only answer to all this is go to a lab who does all the various
kind sof printing and pay for some samples. You'll get the best output from
each source and you can work from there.

Julian
----- Original Message -----
From: <Bob@...>
To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 4:18 PM
Subject: [Digital BW] Re: WHEN will we get simple, reliable BW printing??


> Peter: FWIW, my expereince was that you can load MIS VM ink carts in a
> 1280, use the Roark workflow and get same quality prints in the amount
> of time necessary to learn how to do the same in a wet darkroom.
> Ditto, the MIS FSN inks with Woolf workflow. Ditto, Black Only using
> Clayton Jones workflow. None will be great but at least the quality as
> a beginning wet darkroom worker having spent the same time.
>
> BTW, Epson replaced my 1280 under warranty even after I told them it
> was ruined by a 3rd party flush cart.
>
> Bob Michaels
>
>  --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, peter nelson
> <peter@s...> wrote:
> > At 09:27 AM 2/12/2003 +0000,
> DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> > wrote:
> > >Are you asking when simple reliable BW printing will be available or
> > >when it will be available using color inks on the 2200?
> > >
> > >If you insist on using the the 2200 and color inks you will, it seems,
> > >not be happy with the results.  If you use quadtone inks ( I only have
> > >experience with MIS or Piezotones) you will get the quality you are
> > >looking for.
> >
> >
> > I don't care if I use the 2200.  I'm happy to use any wide format
> > (13"x19" or bigger) printer.  The requirement is that the process
> > does not void the printer's warranty and that I have some reason
> > to be confident that *I* can get good results.
> >
> > As I said in my original post, I have no doubt that SOME people
> > can get quads to work well.   But the impression I get from
> > reading this forum and others is that it's hit and miss, and that
> > it depends on your tolerance for tweaking and playing under
> > the hood.   I've read tons of posts from people who tried it
> > really hard and never got good results.   I quoted one poster
> > who said he tried quads for a YEAR and didn't get as good a
> > result as his first print out of the box with his 2200.
> >
> > I can teach anyone to make decent black and white prints
> > in the darkroom in a day.  Not necessarily Ansel Adams,
> > but black blacks, white whites, continuous tones (assuming
> > they exist in the negative, properly developed, fixed, etc.
> > It's a simple, predictable, straightforward process.  If you
> > can follow simple directions it's easy.  I'm looking for a
> > digital printing process that's similarly straightforward and
> > reliable.
> >
> > Some people here tell me we already have it; others say it will
> > never exist, so there seems to be some divergence on that
> > point!
>
>
> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and
other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
>
> If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to
unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same
page.
>
> Please follow these basic guidelines:
> - Include your full name with your message.
> - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep
them short.
> - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header.
> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or
&amp;amp;quot;flames.&amp;amp;quot;
> - Complete your Yahoo profile.
> - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various
resources on the homepage.
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.