Here's how it happened, from start to beginning. Please excuse the terseness, but I'm sure you've all heard it before so I'll try and be brief. The question is at the end if you want to skip the crap. -Bought 1280. Loved it from the start, but paper choice and profiles sucked for "archival" color work. B&W using color sucked more. -Didn't like the idea of paying hundreds for Piezography or similar system, so never bought that. Didn't know about MIS inks or similar things at the time. I wish I had known about this forum!!! -2200 came out! Reviews (not from Epson) talked about how wonderful the B&W output was. No metarism apparantly, and anyway I had no idea what the hell that actually meant. Had gray balancer - wonderful! -Bought 2200. Color work is excellent. Can use favorite semi-gloss paper without it looking like crap, and it will last more than a year or two, so I can now give pictures away without feeling cheap. -B&W not so good. Getting neutral gray almost impossible even with gray balancer. I start to quickly learn about metamerism in the same way that you learn very quickly about a rare disease you just caught. I wasted about 100 bucks on paper and inks with Gray balancer and still am not there. -Start looking into these RIPs. Download PowerRIP demo (thanks Daniel). Actually looks pretty damn good (I recommend trying it), but still is not there for me because I'm just really fussy. 0-10% looks fairly dotty. Thought about IP5, but 500 bucks is a bit much. Metamerism still exists but it is VERY reduced over normal color B&W. Can't say why - no flatbed scanner or microscope. -Use BO mode. Awful awful awful. I agree with Peter that some people just can't see the dots. That's great for them, but it really bugs me. It just doesn't look smooth. Not good enough. Bah. -I start to look over at my old 1280 sitting in the corner. I never got round to selling it, and that would probably only get me about 200 bucks. Can't get Imageprint for 200 bucks, PowerRIP still doesn't cut it at that price. So that's my history in B&W printing. Thank God I live in Seattle and the thought of being outside taking pictures is just nowhere in my mind. If I lived somewhere nice I'd feel bad that I have spent all this time on my "photography hobby" with nothing to show for it. Why am bothering to tell you all this? Well, I'm thinking about using the old 1280 with MIS VM inks and those Roark curves. From reading other posts it seems like I might up and running in an evening or two, especially as I'm quite good with printing step wedges and messing around with curves. Would anyone else recommend this as a good setup? Anyone else had the same experience and gone back to the old, rejected Epson? Thanks in advance! Matthew
Message
2200 for color & 1280 for B&W
2003-02-13 by carlislematthew <carlislematthew@hotmail
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.