Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] 2200 for color & 1280 for B&W

2003-02-13 by Evelyn Grant

Been there, but with the 2000P. After that fiasco I've
been afraid to try the 2200. BO has dots that drive me
crazy. My clients weren't thrilled with it either.
Right now I'm running 3 1280 printers from my PC. One
with the Piezo driver and original inks that I now
have to buy from Sundance. But they give me no trouble
and make beautiful prints. The second 1280 I use with
MIS VMS ink with Roark's and Kreb's curves. I tried
the Cone Carbon Sepia ink but there's nothing remotely
sepia about them. And my 3rd 1280 is making color
prints and doing my other general printing. I say go
for the MIS setup, it's relatively inexpensive and I
was making sepia prints in less than 2 hours. I would
never think of giving up my 1280s.
Evelyn 
--- "carlislematthew <carlislematthew@...>"
<carlislematthew@...> wrote:> 
> -Didn't like the idea of paying hundreds for
> Piezography or similar 
> system, so never bought that.  Didn't know about MIS
> inks or similar 
> things at the time.  I wish I had known about this
> forum!!!  
> 
> > Why am bothering to tell you all this?  Well, I'm
> thinking about 
> using the old 1280 with MIS VM inks and those Roark
> curves.  From 
> reading other posts it seems like I might up and
> running in an 
> evening or two, especially as I'm quite good with
> printing step 
> wedges and messing around with curves.
> 
> Would anyone else recommend this as a good setup? 
> Anyone else had 
> the same experience and gone back to the old,
> rejected Epson?
> 
> Thanks in advance!
> 
>    Matthew
> 
> 
> 


__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Shopping - Send Flowers for Valentine's Day
http://shopping.yahoo.com

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.