Austin Franklin wrote: >>On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 04:33:28AM -0500, Austin Franklin wrote: >> >> >>>>Personally I don't get on with the dodging and burning tools. Far >>>>too crude! >>>>Instead I make feathered selections and then dodge and burn that >>>>area using the >>>>curves tool. It gives me far more control, especially when there >>>>is need to >>>>manipulate contrast locally. All this can be done in 16-bit. >>>> >>>> >>>Tony, >>> >>>I agree. I do this the same way. >>> >>>Regards, >>> >>>Austin >>> >>> >>> >>Disgraceful! I thought you were an image purist Austin - how dare you >>manipulate nature's tones in defiance of the original scene <g>! >> >> > >I am an image purist! Just because someone else got them wrong along the >way, and I have to fix them, I find modifying curves (in only selective >areas as need be) to be a far more "pure" approach. > > > > <BANG!> A shot rings out, as unable to bear the contorted rationalisations any longer, Keith shoots himself in a fit of utter frustration. Keith "Just some guy," and caretaker of the Multiverse's largest EPSON printer User Community (highly recommended by Vogon Poets and MegaDodo Publications), at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EPSONx7x_Printers/ "For the rest of you out there, the secret is to bang the rocks together guys" [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Edit 16-bit images in PS?
2003-02-20 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.