Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] Epson 2200 RIP: further results?

2003-02-21 by danielstaver <daniel@petraflux.com>

It's probably not the RIP's fault, it's your cable. I've tried all
three connection types on my 2100 and LPT was the slowest by far. And
by that I mean _much_ slower than with USB or Firewire.

Can't the RIP and the driver coexist on the same port?

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Peter Palmieri
<pcpalmieri@c...> wrote:
> Sandy--I started to make a 13X19 print today using the RIP with the
2200 and Hahnemuhle Photo Rag paper. After all the good trial prints
that I have been getting with the RIP, I was looking forward with
great anticipation making a print with the HPR paper. However, the
printer was going so slow--I mean very, very slow--that I stopped the
printing. The printer is connected to the USB port for "normal"
printing and to the LPT port for the RIP. It doesn't run slow with the
"normal" printer. 
> 
> I am using WIN XP with 2GB of RAM, an 80GB Hard Drive and P4 2.8
chip, so I don't think it is the computer is causing it to run so
slow. As soon as I can find a 10' Firewire cord I will disconnect the
RIP printer and reinstall it with the Firewire connection. In the
meantime, any suggestions you have that I could implement to improve
the RIP's printing speed would be much appreciated. 
> 
> Thanks in advance
> 
> Peter Palmieri
> 
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.