I find the paper base of EEM or at least the EAM I tried to be warmer than I like. I prefer the base of Somerset Velvet Photo Enhanced, but I'm not fond of it's texture. I have fond photo rag to be my favorite paper - of course it would have to be it cost the most. The base is cooler than the EEM and is acceptable. It has superior blacks, good shadow detail and as good of highlight detail as the Somerset. On photo rage the blacks are deep and the highlights glow and the base is neutral enough to get a good cool print, like the selenium toned prints I spend hours fussing over in the darkroom. Truman Bob_Michaels wrote: >Jerry: not only can I not see a quality difference between HWM & EEM >but the exhalted Photo Rag doesn't look any better to my eye. I print >the same image consecutively on all three papers and I just can't say >HPR looks any better. All three differ, oh so slightly, but none is >better. > >I even printed HPR on the other side just to make sure I wasn't using >the back side. I had it right the first time. > >I still try be objective and open minded plus continuing to learn. In >that regard, I will say that my hextone prints (Woolf workflow) are >now looking better than my Black Only. That wasn't the case last >month. Who knows, maybe in the future my prints on big $ HPR will look >better than on cheaper paper. > >I'm still open to ideas. > >Bob Michaels > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] HWM v. EEM v. HPR, was: HWM rated more archival than EAM/EEM !?
2003-02-22 by Truman Prevatt
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.