Diffused daylight. Truman Seth Rossman wrote: >But, neither of you gentlemen has said in EXACTLY what light you are looking >at them. Brightness and type could play a significant role in eyeballing >papers (?!?!) > >Seth > >= >=Truman: This is amazing. I pulled out an image I just printed >=on all three papers. Critically comparing the HPR and EEM >=prints side by side, I simply can see no difference in the >=blacks, shadow detail or highlights. And, the base of the EEM >=is very slightly whiter than the HPR. All different from your >=observations. Maybe they vary in production batches. Anyway, >=very puzzling. >=Bob Michaels > > >Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: > >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > >If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page. > >Please follow these basic guidelines: >- Include your full name with your message. >- Include the address of your website, if you have one. >- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short. >- As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header. >- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames." >- Complete your Yahoo profile. >- Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage. > > > > >Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > > > >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] HWM v. EEM v. HPR, was: HWM rated more archival than EAM/EEM !?
2003-02-23 by Truman Prevatt
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.