=Just curious as to what your thinking is in that if we scan =the negatives we should just do digital images in the first place? = Once you scan, you ARE digital. It's just a LOT of extra work. Processing, scanning plus all the Photoshop work. But, add dust removal, etc. to the equation. Don't get me wrong. I have two D1s. And, an F100 and Hasselblad 503CW for film. Still have a B&W darkroom. Right after getting the D1's I was very skeptical for quite a while. Then I wound up on a job in Italy and Crete. I shot EVERYTHING important on both digital and Provia (35mm). I am here to tell you that have slides that are NO better than the digital when printed on EAM. I WILL admit if I were making murals or 30x40's I would use the film. But I don't do that. Even in that case I would go to a 4x5 inter-neg. /r, Seth
Message
RE: Re[2]: [Digital BW] best scanner for b&w
2003-02-23 by Seth
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.