Hi Bob, one reason might be that the image hasn't 100% blacks. You can verify it in Photoshop: if the darkest parts of the picture, those that should be pure black, with no detail, even read 1 or 2 rather than 0, you're not getting the best blacks in the final print. As someone else posted not long ago, checking this is worth as a standard routine before printing, but the more so when comparing papers. Hope this helps, Alessandro -----Original Message----- From: Bob_Michaels <bob@...> [mailto:bob@...] Sent: domenica 23 febbraio 2003 0:18 To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Digital BW] HWM v. EEM v. HPR, was: HWM rated more archival than EAM/EEM !? Truman: This is amazing. I pulled out an image I just printed on all three papers. Critically comparing the HPR and EEM prints side by side, I simply can see no difference in the blacks, shadow detail or highlights. And, the base of the EEM is very slightly whiter than the HPR. All different from your observations. Maybe they vary in production batches. Anyway, very puzzling. Bob Michaels [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
RE: [Digital BW] HWM v. EEM v. HPR, was: HWM rated more archival than EAM/EEM !?
2003-02-24 by Alessandro Pardi
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.