Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

RE: [Digital BW] HWM v. EEM v. HPR, was: HWM rated more archival than EAM/EEM !?

2003-02-24 by Seth Rossman

Geez. See?  So many variables.  Beyond everyone seeing things a little
differently, if we take Roark's densitometer readings into account, the
papers would look different. Both are equally "bright," but one is magenta;
the othe blue. Late afternoon sunlight --in  February-- is extremely warm,
so would make them look different. Ever so slightly.  

What do brighteners do in the densitometer equation? My educated guess is
that the X-rite sees them differently (more equally) than we do while
holding the paper out in daylight.

Seems to me some of the Mitsubishi papers were magenta, so I quit using them
right away.  I think someone said last week that they do some of the
coatings for Epson, so who knows.

Thanks for the feedback. 

=From: Bob_Michaels 

=Mine was viewed originally under bright flourescent but one of 
=those with the color of incadescent. But, I just took them 
=outside to view them in late afternoon daylight and the 
=conclusions are the same. HWM is a tad brighter than EEM. 
=Photo Rag is the creamiest of all, and by a  noticeable amount. 
=

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.