Geez. See? So many variables. Beyond everyone seeing things a little differently, if we take Roark's densitometer readings into account, the papers would look different. Both are equally "bright," but one is magenta; the othe blue. Late afternoon sunlight --in February-- is extremely warm, so would make them look different. Ever so slightly. What do brighteners do in the densitometer equation? My educated guess is that the X-rite sees them differently (more equally) than we do while holding the paper out in daylight. Seems to me some of the Mitsubishi papers were magenta, so I quit using them right away. I think someone said last week that they do some of the coatings for Epson, so who knows. Thanks for the feedback. =From: Bob_Michaels =Mine was viewed originally under bright flourescent but one of =those with the color of incadescent. But, I just took them =outside to view them in late afternoon daylight and the =conclusions are the same. HWM is a tad brighter than EEM. =Photo Rag is the creamiest of all, and by a noticeable amount. =
Message
RE: [Digital BW] HWM v. EEM v. HPR, was: HWM rated more archival than EAM/EEM !?
2003-02-24 by Seth Rossman
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.