I think Ken does produce Perfect Prints...to his own aesthetic senibility...and I like them very much. I agree with Tyler and Ken too that there are many possibilities in this art that do not need to be bound by some dictates from an individual or school of photography. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder (cliche of the day). Steadman Tyler wrote: > > I appreciate your input to my query for information about printing on > uncoated papers. In your message, you bring up a good point for > discussion...What is a satisfactory print? snip Nice post Ken. I can only add that if people could see your work (post your URL?) they might realize you are not as bound by some of the "standards" many other photographers feel compelled to meet. Your wide open approach to the possibilities of craft suit your work well, and are worth consideration by all. Tyler [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Technically Perfect Print was: Uncoated Papers
2001-09-19 by Steadman Uhlich
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.