The SD9 isn't a 9 megapixel camera, just a 3 megapixel true colour camera. The 10D is an incremental upgrade for the D60, not a higher-resolution replacement. I don't think anyone happy with their D60 will buy it. The Kodak 14n still hasn't got any real samples out, which is a bit of a worry. In article <3E5B9ED2.C7F1FF57@...>, jerryolson@... (Jerry Olson) wrote: > Diane, I still want the 12 megapixels, (11 is ok). Chip prices are > falling fast, and the new foveon chip will cause them > to fall faster. The current Sigma Foveon camera is (3) but effectively 9 > megapixels, and is noticeably sharper than the D60. But the Sigma camera > isn't for me. a 4.2 megapixel Canon camera for 4000 dollars is nuts. I'd > never pay that much for 4 megapixels no matter how good the camera > itself was. I need the resolution, NOT the top of the line camera. I > have plenty of memory and speed to take care of the larger files. I > would NEVER spend 4000 dollars for a digital camera, so I'll wait until > I get what I want for $2500 or less. If it doesn't happen, I'll simply > live with my D60. > > > The 1D is still only a 4MP camera and is being snapped > > up by many as it has dropped below the $4000 point. > > If you can live with 4 megapixel resolution. It still is far from a > bargain. The new Nikon/Kodak is 14 megapixels > for $4000. Canon better get on board, or people are going to be > switching to the Kodak. > > Jerry >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: OT Canon 10D
2003-02-25 by derek_c@cix.co.uk
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.