Digital BW, The Print

Of course we could always get back on-list and discuss whether a Bayer 
camera or a Foveon sensor gives better B&W images :-)

In article <NABBLIJOIFAICKBIEPJJEEOGEHAB.darkroom@...>, 
darkroom@... (Austin Franklin) wrote:

> > Allow me to come to Mike's defense. I, for two, am tired of
> > weeding out your
> > emails from this list. Your discussion has gone beyond boring to 
> > beyond
> > ridiculous. Have it on your own time and please spare us the 
> > excruciating
> > details of your personal psychological profiles. I read this list for 
> > it's
> > often useful and interesting information on digital B/W printing
> > etc. not to
> > witness your "pissing match".  Get together, find a snowbank and
> > measure the
> > arc of your debate 'til you're blue in the face! : >
> > ...Awaiting your very predictable final word Austin....
> >
> > Sue
> 
> Sue,
> 
> If you don't like a discussion, or the person posting, just delete the
> posts, instead of whining.  I get tons of posts about things I have no
> interest in, and I simply delete them.
> 
> If you want to contribute to the list, the list is better served by 
> posting
> something on topic, instead of this blatant whining.  You can, and 
> should,
> do that off list.  At least I contribute to the list, not always 
> on-topic,
> or what everyone wants to read, but that's the nature of email lists.
> 
> And, it was discussed a while ago that digital imaging does fall under 
> the
> purview of "on topic" for this list.  If I am mistaken, or that has 
> changed,
> I would expect the list owners to speak up and say so.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Austin