Harvey, Try to imagine one of Ansel Adams prints without a proper black. Think it would be impressive? If he just had charcoal grays where blacks should have been, I doubt if he would have been considered a good printer. Most (but not all) landscapes need that deep black to make a satisfying print. And please keep in mind I did not say ALL prints should have a deep black. At school, we were always taught that a proper print, except high key prints, should have a paper white, a full range of grays, and a black, somewhere in the print that was as deep as the paper could produce. In fact if a print did not have these qualities, it was an automatic reprint. I had Boris Dobro as a teacher, and he was a master printer. World Class. Jerry SKID Photography wrote: > > I think it's unfortunate that you seem to have such a limited view of what can comprise a 'beautiful' image. > To be hemmed in by perfect black and pure white seems so limiting, when there are ranges of emotions to evoke. >nfo/terms/
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Technically Perfect Print was: Uncoated Papers
2001-09-20 by Jerry Olson
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.