Peter, I didn't say that; I replied to 'Jon' who said it!! I actually said much the same as you - I think. Bob Frost. ----- Original Message ----- From: <peter@...> > <bobfrost@b...> wrote: > > This mindless pedantry is lowering the value of the list. > > But how do we decide what pedantry is mindless? > > As a former inkjet driver writer and a current image > processing sw engineer I have an interest in the > dithering and rendering algorithms used in inkjet > printing. Fixed or variable cell size, stochastic > or deterministic dithering algorithms, resample first > or interpolate from the original pixels? Etc. These > things might seem esoteric and arcane to you and some > others but they have consequences for our printing. > > This stuff might seem pedantic (hence my joke in my > response to Austin about this being worth 30% of your > grade on the optimal DPI thread) but as long as they > are filled with facts and knowledge and not ad hominem > attacks I don't see anything wrong with them here. > > I recently posted a link to my website to a study I was > doing on inkjet printing on artist's media which is > even more esoteric. I'm about to update it with some > new information about the differences between Epson > Photo Black and Matte Black inks that have real, if > arcane, relevance to black and white inkjet printing.
Message
Re: [Digital BW] RE: Re: Current Digital Camera Threads
2003-02-28 by Bob Frost
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.