Bob and Austin, So far all I read is pure theory and second guessing. Has anyone actually tried to make a high res. file with say, Photoshop and print at differing output resolutions to see at what point there is no visible diffence? Much in the manner of a lens testing chart. If it has already been done maybe someone could publish a URL. I personally am only interested in the finished print and not the theory. If you can come up with a suitable target I would like to get hold of a copy. Barry --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Bob Frost" <bobfrost@b...> wrote: > Austin, > > Not quite so easy I'm afraid, according to Epson. It is dependant not only > on the driver, but also on the OS and the software program you are printing > from. For example, Epson state the OS limit for the 3000 is 44", the > Photoshop limit is 41", the Adobe Illustrator limit is 227", The > QuarkExpress limit is 48", and the Coreldraw limit is 1800"!! > > However, having read the Epson blurb again, I'm not sure where the boundary > is. The 7000 and up are certainly large-format, but whether the 3000, 5000, > and 5500 are 'desktop' or not isn't absolutely clear to me. But the test is > simply whether the page limit size in PS is 41" or 82". > > My 1290 certainly has a limit of 41.666 inches. If you set the ppi to 720 in > Image Size and try and enter a height of 100 inches, it puts up an error > message and defaults to 41.666. > > Bob Frost. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Austin Franklin" <darkroom@i...> > > > > > > Easy to tell. If it resamples to 720, your maximum print length is ~44", > > and if it resamples to 360, max print length is ~88". > > > > > Are 2200's and > > > 1280's considered desktop or large format? > > > > I would assume desktop. Even the 3000 is desktop, as it has a max length > of > > 44".
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Optimal DPI
2003-02-28 by flyfishingusa2002 <tflyfish@citlink.net>
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.