IMHO the 2200 is a very nice printer. Better than my (lately lamented) 1270. That said, the grayscale images with the Epson driver show metamerism (not nearly as bad as previous printers, but still there.) For this reason I bought IP5. The IP5 grayscale prints are excellent. Minimal metamerism (and you have to get into some fluorescent situations to see it.) Daylight, tungsten and D50 tubes look excellent. I agree that if Epson knows how to produce a "neutral" print, they should have included this capability with the printer. Is this yet another graybalancer issue? -----Original Message----- From: mh <mh@...> [mailto:mh@...] Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2003 10:09 AM To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Optimal DPI I am not sure what you are fussing about, aren't the 2200 series supposed to print great B&W just with the regular driver? I think epson assumes that that is fine for the majority of users (considering it is so much better than what was available as a stock solution before). -mh --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Peter Nelson < peter@s...>" <peter@s...> wrote: > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Bob Frost" > <bobfrost@b...> wrote: > > Peter, > > > > Surely the answer is simply that the vast majority of people who > print with > > Epson printers do not print in B&W and do not want to. B&W printing > is a > > specialised market. > > If it were that specialized why did Epson bother to include > a black and whiter sample with the printer? Why do they > advertise the printer's black and white printing ability > in their sales and marketing literature? Why do they have > a special Grayscale program and test reference? > > The point is that if they are going to do it all, and they > know HOW to do it right, why not just do it right? Their driver > has a black only, and a color setting. They could have had > a "black and white" setting that uses the same algorithm that > their RIP uses. And don't forget, Epson released a special driver > last year for the 2000 that attempts to correct for metamerism. > > Or they could sell a special "black and white" printing option > if they wanted to milk it for money. But it's bizarre to > only have that feature in a RIP since a RIP, as was pointed out, > is a very specialized piece of software few people need. Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page. Please follow these basic guidelines: - Include your full name with your message. - Include the address of your website, if you have one. - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short. - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header. - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or &amp;quot;flames.&amp;quot; - Complete your Yahoo profile. - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Optimal DPI
2003-03-01 by Shire,Stanley
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.