Thanks Bob, that is clear as a bell and makes sense, at least to me. Steve --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Bob Frost" <bobfrost@b...> wrote: > Stephen, > > The advice from Kennedy McEwan (who has studied this in some detail) on > another list is that if your ppi is below 240, you should upsample using PS > bicubic to 360 ppi. If it is above 480 ppi, you should downsample to 360 > using PS bicubic. If it is between 240 and 480, you should leave it as it > is. > > Nice and simple. For desktop Epsons (that use 720 internally). > > Large-format Epsons that use 360 internally, may need different advice. > > Bob Frost. > > > > > > Stephen Kobrin wrote: > > > So, for those of us who are not as deeply into the technology as many > > > on the list, what is the "bottom line" here. Is there any real > > > advantage to sending files to the Epson driver at precisely 360 dpi. > > > I tend to scan at the maximum resoulution for my LS-2000 which means > > > the resolution of files printed at 5X7 or even somewhat larger is > > > around 400 dpi.
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Optimal dpi
2003-03-01 by Stephen Kobrin <skobrin@hotmail.com>
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.