--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "jim hayes <jimhayes@f...>" <jimhayes@f...> wrote: > What would happen if an image file were first upsampled 200% using GF, > then montaged with a second file of higher native size....and then > finally GF used again to downsize to a smaller extent the montage > after it is saved as a psd or tiff and flattened? > > Final file size after second iteration would be greater than original > smaller file size. It would be downsampled(GF) or downsized(Pshop > image size dialog) the second time so as to enable different sizes > (small and large) to be printed on Epson 2200. Sizes around 8x10 and > 11.5x17. > > Also: Andrew Rodney believes that GF is not better than Pshop bicubic > for printer output unless file is at least 20MB to start out with. I > assume that is RGB---> a 6MP digital camera is bare minimum needed. > Any thoughts? I know many in the group think that the MP count should > be way higher before they buy one. > TIA, > Jim H. Correction: Michael Reichmann, not Andrew Raodney. Aplogies. Jim H.
Message
Re: Double dipping Genuine Fractals+digtal camera printing
2003-03-04 by jim hayes <jimhayes@frii.com>
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.