Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] Shooting for Inkjset was Re: Technically Perfect Print was: Uncoated Papers

2001-09-21 by Carolyn Frayn

I find your views on this very interesting. Having focused on Black and
White photography "after" gaining experience digitally I do not get hung up
on the "is it digital/manipulated?" pro's and con's. I just shoot what I
like and then if required I edit it in Photoshop. Always having the thought
that I can remove or fix what displeases me later.

As you have a more traditional photographic background I'm curious, did you
first take offense at what editing skills photoshop offered when you were
first introduced to it?  There has been so much debate in the magazines and
on the web over the years about the manipulation of "pure" photography and
whether it renders it unacceptable to some groups of people. Did you feel
that way at one time and change your mind... or were you always open to new
ways to interpret your work?


Carolyn

> 
> Brian,
> 
> Thanks for the feedback. The digital aspect is slowly creeping into
> my thoughts in the field. I almost walked away from a shot a while
> ago and then suddenly thought, "Wait a minute! I can take out those
> power lines in the corner with Photoshop!" Seems so obvious but old
> habits die hard.
> 
> Martin

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.