> It somehow seems to make sense that blending the inkjet coating into > the paper instead of simply coating it would produce a better paper, > but I would love to hear any theories and explanations as to why. > And also what the down side might be? Does the company making this > have a web-site? Is there any more info available beyond the two- > second sound bite we've been tossed so far? Steve, Usually a coating is applied after the papermaking. For high quality offset paper it is quite common to apply a coating afterwards to get the best results. That can be done inline just after the papermachine or on separate coating equipment. Coating machines with blades, rods etc are used. Schoellershammer (Germany) brought some inkjet coated papers on the market about 18 months ago. They claimed that the paper was coated in the paper pulp before actual papermaking and that it had advantages. I've printed with Generations on that paper and it doesn't give me the print quality that the Hahnemuhle coating has. The surface certainly will not flake as the bond of the coating is much better than with an applied coating like Hahnemuhle's. The surface is smoother. The paper more flexible. Price lower. Cost of coatings isn't in the material itself but the coating process. If it can be done in the pulp making it is more expensive in material but far cheaper in the process. That isn't different with offset paper production. Ernst
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Infused Paper? any more info?
2003-03-11 by Ernst Dinkla
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.