Jerry Olson wrote: <snip> If you just > print it like a commercial print, it doesn't have enough punch to carry > the image as fine art. Jerry, I'm sorry, I don't understand what you are saying here....Are you saying that Art prints need to have 'punch' to be considered Art? If so, that will come as quite a surprise to a lot of curators and collectors. ;- ) And....What did that make Ansel's stuff in the 1960's, or what about that sloth, Edward Weston? ;- ) Harvey Ferdschneider partner, SKID Photography, NYC [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Technically Perfect Print was: Uncoated Papers
2001-09-22 by SKID Photography