Tyler, I think that it has to do with the strange way paper has been distributed for centuries. The paper manufacturers never sold directly but simply supplied paper to converting companies to be cut and packaged under their own label. My experience so far has been that the papers under different names print pretty much the same. Maybe they have done a coating change. Hahnemule is supposed to be pretty reputable so I would be surprised if they were selling "seconds". Give Media Street a call and see what they say. If you go into the "Files" section in the "Paper database" folder there is a spreadsheet and word documents that give all the different Hahnemule name equivalent that Antonis tracked down. Hope that helps. Martin --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "Tyler Boley" <tyler@t...> wrote: > My testing on Conetech Wells River, Lumijet Woven Fiber, and Media Street R= > oyal Jazz indicated that they are all William > Turner 190. They seemed identical in every way. I confess I tend to shop ar= > ound a bit for paper, recently Media Street > lowered their prices even lower than Wells River, so I bought a box of Roya= > l Jazz. Though it looks the same, it's printing > quite differently (worse), more so than normal batch differences. > I'm just wondering if anyone else has been using these papers from the diff= > erent sellers, and if you've run into any > problems. > I find this rebranding thing a constant hassle, I wish these people would j= > ust tell us exactly what the paper is. > What's the big deal? I'm wondering if Hahnemühle is selling batches that fa= > iled to meet manufactures' tolerances at lower > prices to some of these outlets on the condition they are rebranded, allowi= > ng them to underprice the others.. > Anyway, any other Wells River users out there with experience with these ot= > her "versions"? > Tyler
Message
Re: Hahnemühle equivalents
2001-09-22 by Martin Wesley
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.