After all it is the image that counts. It is not the steps that got you there. Weston probably didn't care a whole lot about how he got there. He got there the best he could. And he got there better than 99.9% of the photographers that have ever lived or will ever live did or will. Truman Simon Lamb wrote: >Nothing at all bogus about my argument, but your comments illustrate my >point exactly. > >Why should I tell anyone what paper and inks I used. If I am showing an >image, who cares if it was printed using piezo inks on an Epson 3000 or the >watered down oil from my car and drawn with a needle and lots of patience. >Damn right, as long as the image is appreciated and conveys the message I >intended, who cares. > >
Message
Re: Ynt: Re: [Digital BW] RE: Is this noise or what (was: Epson3200 - Test results)
2003-03-18 by Truman Prevatt