Digital BW, The Print

That's what I told.

Julian said: "... they are very second rate IMO compared to film
scanners ..." (about Epson 1680/3200)
I added: "... for 35mm film."

Loris.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Editor P.O.V. Image Service [mailto:editor@...] 
> Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 2:10 AM
> To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: Ynt: Re: [Digital BW] RE: Is this noise or what 
> (was: Epson3200 - Test results)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Loris Medici wrote:
> 
> >Simon, respectfully: *over sharpening* - as one usually do 
> with Epson 
> >flatbeds - is not "bringing the detail which is there"... this is 
> >simply "making up pixels". I totally agree with Julian on his last 
> >statement adding "for 35mm film" on the end.
> >
> >
> >  
> >
> If you are serious about scanning 35mm, you really NEED a 
> film scanner.. Keith