Harald, Andrew, A very detailed report with most of the pros and cons of this paper described. It doesn't settle the fade resistance claims, something that is hard to do in the time given. It showed that the water resistance is not as claimed. What I did miss in the test is comparing it with "untreated Bockingford paper", the watercolour paper you can get in art supply shops . Especially when Andrew writes in his conclusion: " It excels in areas where prints will be handled, and the "embedded in the paper" feel is a unique--and if I might say "IRIS inkjet" look that I remember from using uncoated papers with that technology over the years " I would have thought that buying some plain Bockingford would have made this test more meaningful. I fear it isn't the revolution in inkjet technology as it was presented in the PMA report. Ernst
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Bockingford Inkjet paper review
2003-03-18 by Ernst Dinkla
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.