I can compare 2200/IP5 (Windows) output to 1280/VM standard and see dots in highlights (Vm/1280 is continuous), or on Paul's stepwedge. But it is a matter of degree. They are really small, you have to be up close and comparing side by side. The shadows are a bit compressed as well. Somewhere around 96%-100% it is hard to tell the diff between 1% k patches. However, when I look at a print done on both 2200 and 1280 with VM, the IP5 print somehow looks sharper, but it's hard to describe how. I wouldn't advise anyone considering 2200/IP5/Epson UC to not try it out first for themselves. The demo may be available for IP5 but borrowing an 2200 might be an issue. So if MIS has "quad"(?) carts/ink for the 2200, then Paul has done curves for it or? Jim H. --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Jerry Olson <jerryolson@r...> wrote: > Jim you say you are getting dots in the higlights on a 2200 printer? I > thought you were speaking of a 1280! I can't imagine the 2200 printer > having ANY dots!!! > > > > > > They don't have the inkset set up for the 2200 do they? I was thinking > > of trying them (they are the 4.35, alais "eboni" inkset right?) > > Yes, the inks are available in bulk or cartridges now. > > Jerry
Message
[Digital BW] Re: How my 2200 vs 1280 w/ OEM ink clog in my environment...?
2003-03-19 by jim hayes
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.