Actually Harvey, you always express yourself very well indeed... (liquid
heads excl)... <VBG>
I agree, they will outgrow it once the "wow look what I can do" factor dies
and the "tasteful/powerful artistic vision" mind takes over again. The
kids who work with this stuff certainly embrace it... But, talent is
talent... just because you have a great knowledge of certain software does
not mean you have the talent to output something wonderful.
Carolyn
> Photoshop: I have been going round and round on this issue with Carolyn Frayn
> (of this list), and find it difficult to properly express myself...
>
> I find that students of photography can *much* more easily get a good looking
> ('straight') digital print (full tone, black to white, with luminosity etc.)
> than with traditional wet chemical methodology, which takes more technical
> expertise. That said, I find that these same students abuse Photoshop in
> their work...It tends to *scream* "I own a computer, and have Photoshop". I
> assume they will outgrow their dependence on Photoshop's special effects
> algorythms....eg: Too many liquid heads and impressionism. :- )Message
Re: [Digital BW] To Harvey, was Technically Perfect Print
2001-09-22 by Carolyn Frayn
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.