I am just starting to switch from my old darkroom to a digital darkroom. I have several books on the matter including The Digital Photolab, Advanced Black and White Techniques using Photoshop by George Schaub. I am using Photoshop 7 and an Epson 2200. Some prints have come out better than expected for first trys with no really manipulation. Others have been flops and look very washed out. When I pump up the contrast or go to levels I then loose detail. I know that more work in Photoshop would solve some of this. However, I showed this print to one person and he strongly suggested 2 things - ImagePrint RIP and color balancing my monitor with Spyder. He seemed to know and he even suggested I join this Group. However, another person to teaches photoshop had already told me that a RIP was a waste of money and that I was nuts to balance my monitor. I have the $750 if I need to purchase this stuff to get a fine art print (or to get a fine art print faster). However, I have no desire to spend money needlessly. Can anyone give me some perspective? Going digital for me is only worth it if I can come darn close to my B&W prints on Ilford or Brilliant paper. I have seen prints that I thought have done just that. My hope would be to take about 30 of my current pieces and print them digitally for a show this summer. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Rob
Message
just getting started - do I need a RIP and Spyder?
2003-03-26 by rjillson77
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.