Actually, I first realized that I had a problem with the spectrocam when I was coating matte prints. The spectrocam was topping out at a dmax of 2 when my coated prints were actually hitting upwards of 2.4. I then went back and checked calibration and realized that anywhere above 1.6 with black the spectrocam was in accurate. The further from 1.6 the worse the problem. Photorag with any of the common BW inks is already a problem. As Antonis mentioned, the spectrocam will be inadequate for any glossy or semi-gloss print with photo black...they all hit above 2.0...and the accuracy of your shadow detail will be what suffers. This will be a serious problem if you get into using the linearization function of ink jet control. Robert On 3/27/03 12:19 PM, "Antonis Ricos" <antonisphoto@...> wrote: > > Ernst, > > 1.7 is conservative as a high end, even for pigmented inks. With the new > Ultrachromes and UltraTones capable of printing on glossy or RC-type > papers, we are soon going to see uncoated, pigmented prints that will exceed > 2.0. > > > Antonis > > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Ernst Dinkla" > <E.Dinkla@c...> wrote: >> Robert, you wrote: >> >>> Yeah...don't buy a spectrophotometer like the spectrocam, >> either for this >>> application. I have one and it doesn't read reliably above >> 1.7. >> >> I guess I can find a densitometer somewhere but with a SpectroCam >> available here I wonder whether it is totally useless for this >> kind of work. The 1,7 is near the black of most pigment inksets >> and only dye + coated pigment blacks go beyond that figure. Am I >> right on that observation ? >> >> Ernst > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other > resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to > unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same > page. > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > - Include your full name with your message. > - Include the address of your website, if you have one. > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep > them short. > - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header. > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or > &amp;quot;flames.&amp;quot; > - Complete your Yahoo profile. > - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various > resources on the homepage. > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Densitometer specs
2003-03-28 by Robert Morrison
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.