> Actually, I first realized that I had a problem with the spectrocam when I > was coating matte prints. The spectrocam was topping out at a dmax of 2 > when my coated prints were actually hitting upwards of 2.4. I then went > back and checked calibration and realized that anywhere above 1.6 with black > the spectrocam was in accurate. The further from 1.6 the worse the problem. > Photorag with any of the common BW inks is already a problem. As Antonis > mentioned, the spectrocam will be inadequate for any glossy or semi-gloss > print with photo black...they all hit above 2.0...and the accuracy of your > shadow detail will be what suffers. This will be a serious problem if you > get into using the linearization function of ink jet control. > > Robert > > 1.7 is conservative as a high end, even for pigmented inks. With the new > > Ultrachromes and UltraTones capable of printing on glossy or RC-type > > papers, we are soon going to see uncoated, pigmented prints that will exceed > > 2.0. > > > > > > Antonis Antonis, Robert, thank you. It is good to know this. Ernst
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Densitometer specs
2003-03-28 by Ernst Dinkla
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.