At 03:39 PM 4/7/03 -0500, you wrote: >Because he is a journalist. You have to be able to believe the photos he >takes are real. It would be like a writer making up a quote. If you can't >believe what a writer is writing why bother reading the story. Same with a >photojournalist. If you canât believe the photographs you see in the >paper what is the point of having them. Itâs a credibility issue. If >you can't believe the information in the L.A. Times why read it. > >Steve > Steve, I wouldn't advise anyone to "believe" what they read in a newspaper or see on TV. One has to think critically, be a skeptic, verify. I taught that to my kid back in the sixties same as my dad taught me. The rule of P's: never trust the press, the politicians, the preachers, or the pedagogs. Do you think the government is suddenly going to tell people the truth? One glaring, current example is the push to change the FCC regs to allow further consolidation of media ownership. What, you haven't heard about that in the popular media??? Hmmmm - wonder why? All those dedicated, honest, journalists are paid to illustrate stories for big business interests. If they don't provide grist for the mill they don't keep their jobs. AZ Build a Lookaround! The Lookaround Book. http://www.panoramacamera.us
Message
Re: RE: [Digital BW] Re: Not in BW,but very interesting digital stuff...
2003-04-08 by Alan Zinn
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.