Ernst, you wrote; >>I wonder whether Steve has done much printing after the first installation of the inks and before the 3 weeks rest. Just contamination with some leftover older ink or cleaning fluid not totally taken out of the tubes. Otherwise it has to be separation of the ink and that is strange as the tubes at that point don't drop more than 10 cm and one would expect the pigment to be heavier. <<< I had gone through approx. 30-50% of a four ounce set of bottles (the toners seem to be going faster) before letting the machine sit for 3 weeks. My change-over procedure wasn't even remotely as thourough as yours, but I was changing from one grayscale set to another, not color to grayscale. I'm sure there was some residual contamination, but it wasn't visible, and my tone had been very consistent. But to update: I pulled another 2-3 syringes of LM through the system, at this point I'm sure that all of the remaining LM has been cycled through the dampers. The density of the ink in the damper is now quite dark, you can barely see color when it is back-lit. And, guess what: My printing tone is now back to normal. Whatever is going on, it seems to affect the thinned out LM more than anything else. Since I'm using the 4.3 and Paul changed the toners a little for the final formula, I wonder if the problem hasn't already been taken care of? Paul? Steve K
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Yet another fade test-VM 4.3 vs. Museum Black
2003-04-29 by Steven Karafyllakis
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.