At 03:27 AM 5/2/03 +0000, you wrote: > >what to call the prints... > >I'm leaning more toward "Carbon Ink Photographs" because "carbon" >harkens to the early carbon process which is synonymous with longevity >(and I like the implied link to an "ancient" process), and "ink" is >simply what it is. In addition, working in ink implies something of >an artistic nature, such as pen/brush drawing, lithographs, >photogravure, etc. > >So Carbon Ink is not only an accurate description of what it actually >is (like "silver gelatin"), but in its current context also implies a >modern fusion of ancient and new technologies, something new and >special. "Carbon Pigment" to me seems a bit too technical and >emotionally cold. Carbon Ink seems more warm and personal, and >perhaps even carries a hint of mystery and romance. Imagine a >layperson admiring a print in an art show and reading the label > > Half Dome At Winter Dawn > by Ima Shooter > Carbon Ink Photograph > >Which will trigger the imagination more and make him/her want to >possess it, Carbon Ink or Carbon Pigment? > >(waxing philosophical this evening <g>) > >Regards, - cj > >C, >I symphathise with your struggle to get just the right tone to your medium >description. I am still tweaking the way I discribe prints too. I keep >waffeling with the word "ink." Pigment sounds better to me than ink. >There can't be just one solution. I think it depends on how and where the >photographs are displayed or sold. "Serious" art buyers know conventional >terms for variious media. The average person does not. I would avoid >inventing a new or too similar to old process nomenclature. I'm preparing >an edition of small prints that will be gifts (premium items). They will >be labeled: Continuous tone black and white photograph made with archival >materials. Good enough for most. To those who can't see why photographers >need to be so fussy about this when a watercolor is just a watercolor, >etc., it has to do with marketing and acceptance (as art) as much as anything. AZ Build a Lookaround! The Lookaround Book. http://www.panoramacamera.us
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: OT: What to call the prints...
2003-05-02 by Alan Zinn
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.