So how do you ensure focus? I also have a SS120 + SF 6.0 and use the glass carrier. Regards Shilesh --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "frankg_photo" <fh.gross@s...> wrote: > Problem discovered ! > After a number of months of being very frustrated by the scan > sharpness of my negs in the Polaroid glass carrier, I find out that > the auto focus feature in SF does not work with the glass carrier > (even though the focus button is on and therefore implies that it > works. > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "frankg_photo" > <fh.gross@s...> wrote: > > I know that all scans require some sharpening and that is a simply > > a 'fact of life' - but how can I tell/measure/establish if my > > particular scanner is achieving 'normal and acceptable' levels of > > sharpness standards ? > > > > I personally feel that the scans are all too soft but I've never > > owned another and cant compare. I also dont know anyone else with a > > similar film scanner to try the same neg or transparency elsewhere. > > Even with fine grain material like Kodachrome 25 or 64 the scans > > appear too soft. > > > > I prefer to have no sharpening filter on in the scanner software; > > preferring to leave usm to the very end of the image editing. > > And I make sure the auto focus is on (little 'target symbol' in > the > > centre of the scan frame) in the scanner software. > > I am using the Glass film holder to ensure a flat film plane. > > > > Should I be seeing a crisp and sharp scanned image or is this > > unrealistic ? Any ideas, suggestions ? > > thanks > > Frank
Message
Re: Sprintscan120/Silverfast6 (& Glass holder) scan sharpness problem
2003-05-02 by Shilesh Jani
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.