Thank you for the offer to test scan a couple of frames - maybe I'll take you up on this. Yes I have been in email contact with SF tech support all day - it seems that the Focus button which you refer to that greys out or is col (off/on) is not effective with the glass holder! In other words there is effectively no scanner focusing when the glass carrier is used. It is just focused on wherever the default/manual setting is - which is pretty close but probably the thickness of the glass away from being optimum. Try a few transparencies or negs in this usual mode and then try them with Polaroid Insight (f you have it installed - if not it's free from the polaroid>support>download site) - you may be very surprised at what you thought was in focus. I was - suddenly there is detail and texture that i never saw before ! Frank --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Shilesh Jani" <shilesh.jani@s...> wrote: > Yes it is. Have you confirmed this with people at Silverfast? I know > SF 6 cannot manually focus the SS120. But there is a tab for this > function - must be in all versions of SF. It toggles between being > grayed out and showing an "A". I have assumed that "A" stands for > autofocus - hey how about the SF documentation, eh ;-(. > > Quite frankly, I have not encountered "soft" scans when scanning > transparencies (which is mostly what I use). But, I am going to > explore this further. For me, at least, it may be a lesser problem > because I don't scan too many negatives, and in fact have recently > decided NEVER to shoot them any more. I like the grain I get from > Fujichrome Provia 400 when pushed 1 or 2 stops. And, it is so much > easier to scan than Tri-X or Ilford Delta 3200. I like some features > of SF 6, but I can live without them. > > Is it possible that the problem is in your scanner? If you like, I > would gladly scan a couple of your negatives to test it out. > Contact me off-list. > > If all esle fails, time to be rid of the scanner, and go with a > Minolta or Nikon (argh $$$$). > > Regards. > > Shilesh > > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "frankg_photo" > <fh.gross@s...> wrote: > > > > > > It seems you cant ! If you use the glass carrier you have to use > > other scanning software like Polaroid Insight. > > Very distressing, isn't it. > > > > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Shilesh Jani" > > <shilesh.jani@s...> wrote: > > > So how do you ensure focus? I also have a SS120 + SF 6.0 and use > > the > > > glass carrier. > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > Shilesh > > > > > > --- In > DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "frankg_photo" > > > <fh.gross@s...> wrote: > > > > Problem discovered ! > > > > After a number of months of being very frustrated by the scan > > > > sharpness of my negs in the Polaroid glass carrier, I find out > > that > > > > the auto focus feature in SF does not work with the glass > carrier > > > > (even though the focus button is on and therefore implies that > it > > > > works. > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In > > DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "frankg_photo" > > > > <fh.gross@s...> wrote: > > > > > I know that all scans require some sharpening and that is a > > > simply > > > > > a 'fact of life' - but how can I tell/measure/establish if my > > > > > particular scanner is achieving 'normal and acceptable' > levels > > of > > > > > sharpness standards ? > > > > > > > > > > I personally feel that the scans are all too soft but I've > > never > > > > > owned another and cant compare. I also dont know anyone else > > with > > > a > > > > > similar film scanner to try the same neg or transparency > > > elsewhere. > > > > > Even with fine grain material like Kodachrome 25 or 64 the > > scans > > > > > appear too soft. > > > > > > > > > > I prefer to have no sharpening filter on in the scanner > > software; > > > > > preferring to leave usm to the very end of the image editing. > > > > > And I make sure the auto focus is on (little 'target symbol' > > in > > > > the > > > > > centre of the scan frame) in the scanner software. > > > > > I am using the Glass film holder to ensure a flat film plane. > > > > > > > > > > Should I be seeing a crisp and sharp scanned image or is this > > > > > unrealistic ? Any ideas, suggestions ? > > > > > thanks > > > > > Frank
Message
Re: Sprintscan120/Silverfast6 (& Glass holder) scan sharpness problem
2003-05-02 by frankg_photo
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.