>> Some like compositing clouds from one image into the dull sky of another >> image; some like straight photographs. > >> I like straight. >... but that's the whole point - I bet your "straight" photograph isn't >actually "straight"! Of course, the definition of the term "straight" photography isn't set in stone, and reasonable people can disagree about the meaning. It my be a little like the old US Supreme Court definition of "obscenity" -- you know it when you see it. I understand the term to describe a genre of photography that is roughly defined by how the writers have used it and the nature of the work done by those whose work is held up as samples of the genre. In my 5/3/03 posting on this subject, I cited a number of web sources. Some of the definitions/descriptions included the following: ..."straight," representing the world as it is ... ...Strand produced a body of sharp-focus work, including somewhat abstracted still-lifes ... ...new realism called "straight" photography ... ...Group f/64, which was dedicated to straight photography as an art form ... ...historian Beaumont Newhall said, "Ansel Adams, in his photography, his writing, ... demonstrated the capabilities of straight photography as a medium of expression .... The printers referenced did differing degrees of "manipulations" on their work. So, there is some variance within the style. I don't think being digital, as opposed to wet-darkroom, should directly affect whether a B&W print is "straight" landscape photography or not. At any rate, I see myself doing a logical and inevitable, digital extension of my "straight" silver-print, B&W photography -- but better. Paul http://www.PaulRoark.com _____________________________________________________ -----Original Message----- From: Tim Atherton [mailto:timatherton@...] Sent: Friday, May 09, 2003 8:23 AM To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [Digital BW] Re: un-altered camera image > Some like compositing clouds from one image into the dull sky of another > image; some like straight photographs. > > I like straight. Jim, but that's the whole point - I bet your "straight" photograph isn't actually "straight"! tim Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page. Please follow these basic guidelines: - Include your full name with your message. - Include the address of your website, if you have one. - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short. - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header. - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames." - Complete your Yahoo profile. - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Re: un-altered camera image
2003-05-09 by Paul Roark
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.