I've sometimes wondered at peoples desire to frame without glass. We had an opening here this weekend of photography at the local community college. Half of the work was digital output, most of it behind glass. Now I'm always astonished that people feel they can point to the point of poking works of art - and they DO. There was one work, which was a composite of images blended together for a seamless effect, except the irregular edges were left in place. This is a 'straight' photograph, the blend is only because we don't all walk around with 6x17pano cameras. It had many peoples attention because of their fascination with seeing the perfection of the blend (which the artist did 'manually' in photoshop, not a stitch program). If it had not been behind glass it would effectively been damaged on opening night - and not by children. Therefore if a work is publicly accessible & you want the feel of framing without glazing, I would recommend using AR/Museum glass - Worth the expense. Cleavis
Message
Framing without glass
2003-05-12 by Lyons Cox
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.