I don't doubt that. It could be better CCD, better analog front end, better A/D...basically, better linearity, better noise, better optics...better transport. Many, many other factors make digital image soup ;-) > There's something more in this soup,because even with the dynamic > range of a > chrome not being more than 3.6,a scanner about 4.3DR as the new Nikon 4000 > or cylinder scan better than a 3.6 one... > > > > Also, 16 bits is entirely unnecessary to capture image data at, since no > > film you will be scanning can have a dynamic range of 4.8!
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Minolta DiMAGE Scan Multi PRO
2001-09-26 by Austin Franklin