> >Actually, though, I think Nikon is just blowing smoke to hide something that > >they are working on right now. I hope I'm right, for their sake and mine. Nikon as a whole is having a hard time. Their division for wave steppers and scanners used in the chip industry has lost a lot of the market to ASML. A desperate legal battle doesn't help there. Nikon service has become far worse than it was in the past. Some flaws in the scanner and scan software of the 8000 and 4000 have not been addressed in more than a year. And filmscanners are not a product for the future but digital cameras are. Nikon's digital cameras over the entire range are no competition to Canon's and in the lower range not even to Sony's models. To get it on topic, yes in B&W there will be an advantage to use B&W film for the time being, as soon as sensors get more pixels and or become more sophisticated (Foveon) then there's no advantage anymore. There's an advantage in digital that you can select the sensibility per frame that compensates part of the latitude of B&W film. Not to mention that a double take in digital is far less hassle in the process than in analogue. Yes, start on a tripod. Ernst
Message
Re: [Digital BW] RE: a full-frame Nikon digital SLR this fall? (was Re: [DigitalBW] digital)
2003-05-20 by Ernst Dinkla
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.