I have shot a few rolls of Portra after using Super XP2 regularly. It seems to scan very nicely, but I have two questions and an observation. First, I shoot XP2 at 320 rather than 400. Is that common practice, or do people shoot Portra at its nominal speed of 400? Second, and more subjectively, XP2 has a "creamy" or flowing feeling to it that seems to be missing from Portra. Has anyone else noticed that? Last, based on two rolls -- not a large sample -- it seems that while Portra scans more easily than XP2 the prints I get back from the processor, which I use only as contacts anyway, are more contrasty and have a more limited tonal range than XP2. Steve
Message
Portra B&W
2003-05-20 by Stephen Kobrin
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.