Martin- I don't really think you are losing 2/3 of the info --just not using it. Remember that the (Lab) Lightness or Luminosity Channel IS the B&W layer. The rest is just color info dropped on top. (This is an oversimplification, of course.) The advantage of using the RGB before converting to B&W is in the channel mixer. That really amounts to the same as using yellow, orange, green, etc. filters on a B&W film. Seth =Glad someone found it of use. Unfortunately he (nor do any of =the endless threads here) does not address the basic issue of =what happens when you try to print in B&W. All of the files =and examples he shows are presumably 3 channel RGB. I am =unclined to agree with his 10 megapixal threshold being the =point where direct digital cature equals or exceeds 35mm color =film but what about B&W? Since the conversion to B&W drops 2/3 =of the data the implication is that to match 35mm B&W you =would need 30 megapixal direct capture. = =Martin Wesley =
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Digital, film, scanning comparisons
2003-05-21 by Seth Rossman
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.