Sorry, folks, I just HAVE to agree with Austin on this. (My Coolpix can do that too--so??) It's just an incomplete argument. In a Sinar view camera with a Schneider lens --or what? I am NOT arguing film vs. digital, or anything close. Just incomplete data as a basis for theories of fact. Seth =From: Austin Franklin [mailto:darkroom@...] =Claude, = => I just printed a 13x19 Piezo print from a Sigma XD-9 sensor in a => $1,500 Sigma camera from a $250 macro lens that IN THE PRINT shows => more micro detail than => I could ever get from a 4x5 TriX optical print. = =Good grief, you make me laugh. This is simply a foolish =statement, and I can't imagine how you expect anyone to take =you seriously. I don't mean to be mean here, but you just say =things that have no basis in reality. What did you do to the =poor Tri-X 4x5 to make it come out so horribly? I absolutely =know my 35mm Tri-X gives FAR more detail than the Signal SD-9, =which is what I assume you meant. =
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Digest Number 1514
2003-05-21 by Seth Rossman
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.