At 07:58 AM 5/21/2003 -0700, paul.roark@... wrote: >I sure would not go back, and I'll bet most of the people on this >list have no intention of going back to silver printing for most of their >work. While i am sure this is true i have yet to talk to any serious B&W photographer that will tell me an inkjet print is better than a rich, well-printed fiber-based print. Lots of people have explained to me how it is easier, cheaper, "good enough", etc., but i dont hear the word 'better' very much. For the record, i am doing way more digital output than wet darkroom these days too, but i still think that a well printed silver print still looks better than a well printed inkjet print. Anyone disagree? Maybe that will change, but for now...... -scott http://www.Lanes.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Ink-jet better than wet prints (was Digital stuff)
2003-05-21 by scott lanes